The best solution to instability in the sovereign debt markets is to create more sustainable repayment structures when the debt is originally created thereby significantly reducing the likelihood of default.
The focus of evolving a new financial architecture, so needed in the sovereign debt market, should be squarely on transactional structure at origination, not on institutionalizing more issuer friendly debt work-out protocols.
For the sovereign debt of emerging nations, the onerousness and instability of the obligations is often created upon origination in the form of large amounts of debt coming due in short periods of time (typically denominated in foreign currency) that rely on refinancing as the primary form of repayment.
Why do thousands of municipal issuers across the United States benefit from capital market conventions that allow them to repay debt over extended periods of time, periods that are generally consistent with the useful life of the projects and services being financed, when such rational debt structure and market conventions are not applied to emerging nation borrowers who are most in need of them?
All financial operations are conceptual, based on convention, and as such are always evolving. In a world living under the reality of multiple existential threats, with vast numbers of people living in poverty and under threat of famine, disease, or environmental calamity, where capital flows impact the lives of all the world’s citizens, it is necessary that we, as a global community, examine the entities in control of this evolution and whose interests they are serving.
Click here to download full discussion